• Home
  • ABOUT
  • NEWS
  • ADA
  • CONTACT
  • MAIN SITE
  • 0

Lynne Seabrooke vs. Upper Iowa University

Thursday, 29 March 2012 15:47

Lynne Seabrooke filed her Petition in Federal District Court for the Northern District of Iowa on April 7, 2010 against Upper Iowa University located in the City of Fayette, Iowa claiming that Upper Iowa University's termination of her was in violation of the ADA (Americans with Disability Act).  Trial began on September 12, 2011 with the case submitted to the jury on September 15, 2011 at approximately 11:30 a.m.  The jury reached a verdict just before 7:00 p.m. on September 15, 2011.  The seven women, on man jury found that Upper Iowa University discriminated against Lynne Seabrooke on the basis of her disability.  The jury went on to award damages to Seabrook against Upper Iowa University for lost past earnings and benefits of $119,072.00; medical bills for $706.00; and emotion distress damages of $250,000.00.  The jury also found that Upper Iowa University had acted with malice or reckless indifference for the rights of Seabrooke and awarded punitive damages to her in the amount of $750,000.00.  Judgment in the total amount of $1,119,778.00 was entered of record on Friday, September 16, 2011 on behalf of Seabrooke against Upper Iowa University.

Seabrooke will also be seeking future damages that the Judge determines for future wages and benefits and attorney fees for Seabrooke.  Future lost wages and benefits and attorney fees are determined by the presiding Judge, Federal Magistrate Jon Stuart Scoles.  Seabrooke was represented by Dale L. Putnam and Erik W. Fern from the Putnam Law Office in Decorah, Iowa.  Upper Iowa University was represented by Jen Chase and Max Kirk from Ball, Kirk and Holm, P.C. in Waterloo, Iowa.

Guns in the Home Allowed

 

On June 26th, 2008, the United States Supreme Court finally broke their silence regarding gun control in the home.  In a 5-4 decision, the court struck down a ban on handguns that was in place in the District of Columbia, and invalidates similar laws in other cities, such as San Francisco and Chicago.

The Second Amendment, which had not been decisively interpreted by the Supreme Court since its ratification in 1791, reads: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."  The question for the judges to decide was whether this amendment protects an individual's unreserved right to own a gun, or whether that right is connected to service in a state militia, a group of citizens that was once vital to a state, but is now archaic.

Read more...

Death Sentence Not Allowed for Child Rape Cases

 

On June 25th, 2008, the United States Supreme Court came to a controversial, 5-4 decision that struck down a Louisiana law that allows rapists to face the death penalty if their victims are children.   The Supreme Court banned executions for rape in 1977 in a case which the victim was an adult woman; and currently, five states besides Louisiana have allowed capital punishment in child rape cases-Georgia, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.  Justice Anthony Kennedy stated in his writing of the majority opinion that although the crime is devastating to both the victim and the victim's family, he argues that "the death penalty is not a proportional punishment for the rape of a child."  Kennedy went on to argue that because there have been no recent executions for rape cases, and because there are only a small number of states that allow capital punishment for such cases, he believes "there is a national consensus against capital punishment for the crime of child rape."

While this ruling prohibits the death penalty for any crime against an individual, short of murder, capital punishment is still allowed for crimes such as terrorism, espionage, and treason, which are defined as crimes against the state.

 

More Articles...

  • Supreme Court Victory for Older Workers

Page 1 of 2

Start
Prev
1
2
Next
End
Monday, May 21, 2012

Putnam Law Blog

Jason Simon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Putnam Law Office was founded in Decorah, Iowa, in 1987 by attorney Dale L. Putnam. Since that time, the firm has provided aggressive legal counsel to individuals and businesses throughout Northeast Iowa.

The Putnam Law Office is a general practice law firm with an emphasis on trial practice, personal injury, motor vehicle accidents, American with Disabilities, family law, real estate, probate, corporations and debtor/creditor.

DOWNLOAD

Click here to download the Putnam Law Office My Mobile Attorney
Click here to download the Putnam Law Office My Mobile Attorney
Click here to download the Putnam Law Office My Mobile Attorney
© MMXII Putnam Law Office All Rights Reserved